Meaty Monday: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Monday, June 30th, 2008The following post, as is with all posts on this blog, is solely my own personal opinion and is not meant to be the position of my church. They are also preliminary thoughts.
Well, it has been fascinating to watch the shake-out today across the blogosphere following the actions of the General Assembly last week. Drew offers a post that points to various pro and con posts that have appeared today around the web, and our own denominational leadership offers this pastoral letter to its churches.
What is somewhat surprising is that at least in terms of national media the actions of last week were nowhere near as news-worthy as the ones that happened at the previous General Assembly in Birmingham AL. That year, the national media picked up on the news that the PC(USA) had received a “Trinity Paper” and erroneously reported that the PC(USA) had completely abandoned traditional language for the Trinity. In terms of media attention, there was a lot more damage control to do following that assembly than there will be following this one.
Of course, based on the actions of last week, the denomination is in for another long battle over the standards for ordination surrounding the ordination of GLBT officers (deacons, elders, and ministers) as replacement wording for what is known as ‘amendment b’ has been sent for approval to our local presbyteries. Churches that thought about but did not initiate proceedings to leave following the last GA, will surely be much more serious about doing so this time around, especially since all previous denominational statements about homosexuality were declared moot by this assembly.
Now as to the meat of the argument on the amendment in question, in case you’re not up on these things, our current ‘amendment b’ (G-6.0106b) states:
Those who are called to office in the church are to lead a life in obedience to Scripture and in conformity to the historic and confessional standards of the church. Among these standards is the requirement to life either in fidelity withing the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman, or chastity in singleness. Persons refusing to repent of any self-acknowledged practice which the confessions call sin shall not be ordained and/or installed as deacons, elders, or ministers of the Word and Sacrament.
Some have argued that ‘amendment b’ as it currently stands is about much more than homosexuality, that it really is about all ministers holding to a standard of sexual faithfulness. Now, in theory as one reads the amendment that may very well be the case, but in practice it’s simply not true. In my own experience, I was single, dating, engaged, and then married at various stages during my ordination process and no one dared or bothered to ask me about either my fidelity or chastity during any stage of that process. Surely if this was of concern and someone cared enough, they would have asked me?
Anyway, the new proposed ‘amendment b’ states:
Those who are called to ordained service in the church, by their assent to the constitutional questions for ordination and installation (W-4.4003), pledge themselves to live lives obedient to Jesus Christ the Head of the Church, striving to follow where he leads through the witness of the Scriptures, and to understand the Scriptures through the instruction of the Confessions. In so doing, they declare their fidelity to the standards of the Church. Each governing body charged with examination for ordination and/or installation (G-14.0240 and G-14.0450) establishes the candidate’s sincere efforts to adhere to these standards.
What I find interesting in this proposed replacement of ‘amendment b,’ which has to be voted in the affirmative by the majority of presbyteries in order to take affect, is that in effect it puts those who argue against it in a rather difficult place. In fact, to do so could very well be interpreted to say that one places a higher value on a certain sexual ethic than on the Lordship of Jesus Christ. And that seems to be a place where very few people will really want to be.



