Mad about PUP
Thursday, September 28th, 2006I’ve been hearing a questionable disagreement lately in reference to our denomination’s General Assembly’s recent approval the Peace Unity and Purity Task Force Report. The recent iteration of the disagreement occurs on Pastor John Foreman’s blog:
Many of us are grieved by both the potential result of the AI {AI=Authoritative Interpretation which is a ruling regarding the meaning of our church’s constitution}, and by the means through which the AI was used to change the plain intent of the constitution without the consent of the presbyteries. While we disagree with the intent of the action, which is obviously to open the door to the ordination of individuals who do not meet our constitutional standards for ordination, we even more vehemently disagree with the process used to undo the action of the Presbyteries in ratifying those constitutional standards (three times). This action of the General Assembly constitutes, to many of us, a breech of trust.
In response, I make the following observations:
1. All overtures to overturn G6.0106B {the fidelity/chastity clause which is the ordination standard most people are concerned is likely to be violated} were rejected by the GA at this year’s gathering.
2. The AI recommended by the PUP task force was put in place by the vote of GA without approval of the presbyteries, which is what the rules of the book of order dictate regarding the approval of any authoritative interpretation.