<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thechurchgeek.com/archives/922/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thechurchgeek.com/archives/922</link>
	<description>thoughts on faith, church, and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:03:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.thechurchgeek.com/archives/922/comment-page-1#comment-26983</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechurchgeek.com/?p=922#comment-26983</guid>
		<description>Jim: Re-reading your older posts, I noticed the comment about the &quot;Green Bible&quot; and the rest of the special interest ones out there these days.

I have this book http://www.amazon.com/American-Bible-History-United-1777-1880/dp/0804743398 on my shelves.  It&#039;s been a while since I read it, but the thesis is that the plain &#039;ol Bible is and has been a commodity since the early 1800&#039;s.  You can get one for free or nearly free just about anywhere.  So there&#039;s no money in it for publishers to print text-only Bibles.  The American Bible Society will undercut them every time.

If publishers want to make money on the multi-billion dollar Bible market, they have to well, market them.  Hence the proliferation in the early 1800&#039;s of family Bibles with glossy pictures, maps, the pages in front to record significant family dates, etc.  Of course, since then, the market has become niche marketing--Bibles for tweens, teens, college students, moms, dads, grandpas, grandmas, football players, football referees, the guys who run the chains during games, up to and including a Bible for the cheerleaders.  

So it&#039;s not really about the text itself, it&#039;s about how to market the text to a specific target audience.  Sdaly, in the end, it&#039;s all about the Benjamins--and not the ones in Scripture.

What ever happened to sola Scriptura?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: Re-reading your older posts, I noticed the comment about the &#8220;Green Bible&#8221; and the rest of the special interest ones out there these days.</p>
<p>I have this book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/American-Bible-History-United-1777-1880/dp/0804743398" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/American-Bible-History-United-1777-1880/dp/0804743398</a> on my shelves.  It&#8217;s been a while since I read it, but the thesis is that the plain &#8216;ol Bible is and has been a commodity since the early 1800&#8217;s.  You can get one for free or nearly free just about anywhere.  So there&#8217;s no money in it for publishers to print text-only Bibles.  The American Bible Society will undercut them every time.</p>
<p>If publishers want to make money on the multi-billion dollar Bible market, they have to well, market them.  Hence the proliferation in the early 1800&#8217;s of family Bibles with glossy pictures, maps, the pages in front to record significant family dates, etc.  Of course, since then, the market has become niche marketing&#8211;Bibles for tweens, teens, college students, moms, dads, grandpas, grandmas, football players, football referees, the guys who run the chains during games, up to and including a Bible for the cheerleaders.  </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not really about the text itself, it&#8217;s about how to market the text to a specific target audience.  Sdaly, in the end, it&#8217;s all about the Benjamins&#8211;and not the ones in Scripture.</p>
<p>What ever happened to sola Scriptura?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
